Tim Wirth Analyzes IPCC's 'Climategate'
ALERT
If you are unable to watch videos, that means you either have JavaScript turned off in your web browser or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player.
About this video
Clean Skies News talks to Former Colorado Senator Tim Wirth, President of the United Nations Foundation, about the recent criticism of the IPCC for analyzing how fast the Himalayan glaciers could melt and the potential damage done to the group's reputation because of its reports.
Published: 02/17/10 5:34pm
Running Time: 12:22
Related Keywords: Politics, International (Politics), Clean Skies News, Tim Wirth, ClimateGate, glacier, Himalayan glacier, IPCC, Tim Wirth, UN Foundation, United Nations
Source:
*This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Related Items
China Takes the Lead in Energy Usage
For the first time China surpasses even the U.S. in oil and "oil equivalent" consumption.
- 04:48
- 07/27/10
Energy Ministerial Energizes Clean Tech Research
Energy Ministerial focuses on energy efficiency.
- 02:40
- 07/27/10
IEA Press Conference Pushes Clean Energy Revolution
IEA Executive Director says support from world leaders for stimulus money, technologies, smart grid, important.
- 37:11
- 07/02/10
IEA Says Energy Revolution Underway
Executive Director Nobuo Tanaka says the early signs of an energy revolution are apparent.
- 08:41
- 07/01/10
Now on Clean Skies
Top Stories
CS Sunday: Top Kill, Final Kill?
28:29 | 08/08/10
California's Power Struggle Over Renewable Energy Lines
06:58 | 08/02/10
Science? What a joke. There
Science? What a joke. There has never been any science behind climate research at the IPCC. When a political body or a government is funding research, scientists become prostitutes to the agenda of the politicians funding their research. If a particular research does not give satisfactory results to the politician or government bureaucrat, then they pull the plug on the research funding.
Global Warming is big business, and science is just a TOOL to achieve political agenda.
I highly recommend reading the Resignation Letter of Chris Landsea from IPCC written in 2005. This letter shows the fraud committed by the IPCC.
www . climatechangefacts.info/ClimateChangeDocuments/LandseaResignationLetterFromIPCC.htm
There has been fraud regarding Climate Change research funding:
http : //blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100019956/climategate-the-lawyers-move-in-those-scientists-are-toast/
www . youtube.com/watch?v=Cu_ok37HDuE (ClimateGate Who's Who)
www . youtube.com/watch?v=aUtzMBfDrpI (Armed Response to 'Climategate' question). This is how the UN censors questions about Global Warming.
and more fraud in the carbon trading scheme:
http : //pajamasmedia.com/blog/climategate-european-carbon-credit-trading-system-plagued-by-fraud/
And now, the question everyone should ask: How much carbon reduction is needed to reduce the temperature to the UN target?
Answer: A minimum of 80 years without electricity and without fuel. That is, no heating, no cooking, no cars, no trucks, no tractors for agriculture, no cargo boats and no planes.
www . youtube.com/watch?v=WLKCyk_DhVI (Climate-Gate - Michael Coren with Lord Christopher Monckton)
Follow the money....
"The carbon market in the US is expected to be trillions of dollars by 2015, and the technology we are offering is as little as 10% to half of that number". Earning only 10% of a trillion represents an income of 100 billions a year, which is twice the total wealth Bill Gates accumulated during his lifetime. This is serious money. Guess who is behind this corporation, to become a trillionaire? You have to watch www . youtube.com/watch?v=HuifVNofEtk
Oh, perhaps you missed the scoop. Professor Jones (the director of the East Anglia climate center) told the BBC about the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Aston...